Yesterday 3:07 pm
Vegas » Today, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Oh my God. Your mathematical aptitude is at the same level of BVs.
Here. Focus. Tell me how the electoral college in our republic will register this:
Candidate A: 37% of the votes
Candidate B: 31% of the votes
Candidate C: 32% of the votes.
Candidate A won the percentage. However, 32% + 31% = 63%. That means 63% of the people didn't want candidate A. Since we have an electoral system, then usually (with the exception of Nebraska and Maine) the electoral votes will go to the candidate who received the most votes. Then the overall electoral votes are counted nationally until someone reaches 270. So when a third candidate enters, then it's inherently flawed. Every state will always have far more people who didn't want the winner.
Tell me how the tyranny of the minority is better than the tyranny of the majority.
And AGAIN, ****, the results ONLY MATTER WITH WHO WON!!ONLY IN A DEMOCRACY would your premise even come close to making any difference in life.
The simple FACT IS, the voters whose candidate DID NOT WIN, still have THEIR RIGHTS PROTECTS UNDER OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICAN CONFERATION!! PERIOD!!
Which is the SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS NATION AND OUR CONSTITUTION- to protect the RIGHTS OF THE MINORITY IN ELECTIONS!!
Now, **** OFF, because your entire line of reasoning is FLAWED and not worth even this much discussion. Our founders NEVER intended it to be elections where you MUST have over 50% of the vote to be declared the winner of the ELECTION, otherwise it would have been IN THE CONSTITUTION.
Now, ASSHOLE MORON, SHUT THE **** UP!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.