Can we proceed on the EVIDENCE that the COURT EXCLUDED that IMPLICATED SOMEONE ELSE VOTING FOR ROSEN?? Which the INVESTIGATORS had a CONFESSION did so!!Blackvegetable » Today, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ Should we proceed on the assumption that you do not want to discuss that evidence, or it's implications for Mr. Rosen's status?
Fact is, the PROSECUTION has YET to refile charges!! So that USUALLY MEANS that since APRIL, they are not too confident in their ability to WIN, ****!!
THAT has to really SUCK FOR YOU, right, cupcake??
AND ROSEN IS INNOCENT and has NOT BEEN PROVEN TO BE GUILTY since that SHAM CONVICTION was totally tossed by the STATE SUPREME COURT!! SUCKS even more, huh. pumpkin??
Keep PANTY DANCING!! It looks like the ****** YOU ARE, DOUCHBAG!!
https://media.tenor.com/MR4F5m5O5QwAAAA ... an-flu.gif
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.