Today 6:16 am
In summary, we conclude that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of the defendant’s voting history and precluding Botelho’s statements relating to the 2016 election under Rule 404(b). We also conclude that, should Botelho on remand assert his Fifth Amendment rights, the trial court shall conduct a Richards hearing. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Do you know what that MEANS, ****?? I doubt it since pretty much ALL the EVIDENCE that the State used is NOW NOT USABLE in any "new trial"!! AND you are DUMBER THAN A TRUCK LOAD OF BRICKS and have NO CLUE what this means!!
So now, the State can't show that he voted twice because MASS of TWO **** doesn't have VOTER ID requirements, and that Bothelho's TESTIMONY will happen since a RICHARD'S HEARING will establish IMMUNITY for his testimony FOR THE DEFENSE!!
Now, learn the FINE ART OF SHUT THE **** UP, ****!! The SUPREME COURT'S DECISION just BLISTERED YOUR *** EVEN MORE!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.