12 Jan 2023 5:10 am
A. Yes there is, apologist!! It was not an AUTHORIZED LOCATION that you boy had them in!! THAT is one of the ILLEGAL PARTS, doofarse. The first was removing them in the first place from Government Property. It's also known as stealing.maineman » 11 Jan 2023, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ There is nothing illegal about the Vice President having classified documents in his or her office.
Let me ask you a different way... if an outgoing president can declassify any document he/she wishes, and, as @golfboy has claimed, once declassified, those documents are public, can that outgoing president decide to declassify extremely sensitive intelligence and provide it to anyone in "the public" that he or she sees fit? Even if that intelligence may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation?
B. Once the PRESIDENT declassifies ANYTHING, regardless of it's content, it's available for PUBLIC INSPECTION regardless of what's in it. THAT happens to be his CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY AS HE DESIRES and by any means he wishes. How hard is that for YOU to comprehend?? You keep going back to this same BS "rebuttal" after it''s been PROVEN you are wrong in your assumptions. OBTUSE IDIOTS use this kind of "debating tactic" when they are LOSING AND HAVE LOST!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.