15 Jan 2023 7:11 am
I didn't say that it wasn't going to be "injurious", but it was YOU that said it was a CRIME, which it WOULD NOT BE!!maineman » 14 Jan 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I ask you again:
Let's say that, down in Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump had a document , TS(SCI), that listed all of the sleeper agents we had embedded inside the bureaucracy of Russia. And in the waning days of his administration, in early January 2021, against the strong objections from his DCI, and from his Secretary of State, he told the two of them that he was going to declassify that document and give it to a Russian oligarch who would be dining that evening at Mar-a-Lago and who was considering investing in a new Trump property that would be built in Moscow. You are saying that that act would not be injurious to the nation?
Yes or No?
ANY declassified document becomes available for PUBLIC VIEWING, so there can be NO CRIME as you claim there is. What's to prevent ANY US citizen from using that same DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENT in any manner they desire?? AND DO SO LEGALLY!!
Go back to playing with your alphabet blocks. Children like you have no business trying to become "forum lawyers".
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.