IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑
My morals are about protecting children, sadly...way too often from their own parents...including a child's right to privacy protection under the confidentiality statutes in every State. And that includes privacy from parents, if that's what the child wants and if the child is of legal age. As moral as it gets. You aren't interedted in ethics or morality, you're all about some **** up christian dogma.
Can a CHILD at age 13 sign a LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT?? Nope.
So, is a CHILD at age 13 capable of giving LEGAL CONSENT to an adult to have sex with them?? Nope.Because that ADULT gets charged with a CRIME.
SO how can a CHILD at age 13 have ANY "privacy" protections IF they can't LEGALLY DO ANY OF THAT?? And if they CAN, then how do you support charging an ADULT with "statutory rape" if you believe a CHILD HAS PRIVACY RIGHTS and CAN GIVE CONSENT for ANY medical procedures???
Yet you feel a PARENT has no right to know about LIFE ALTERING "sexuality" of their OWN CHILD??
Your own **** defeats your beliefs, dorkface!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.