1 Jan 2022 4:59 pm
Socialism, Marxism, Marxist/Leninism, Democratic Socialsim, et al are by definition concerned with wealth redistribution.FOS » 01 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ there has never been a great leader who didn't kill people. You could call Churchill a murdering tyrant since, after all, he entered a massively destructive world War he never had to get involved with. The measure of how 'evil' murder is depends basically on who you are murdering. Nothing is wrong with killing your enemy imo.
Also, wealth production comes from innovation.
And all this stuff about redistribution of wealth.. wtf do you think corporations do?? Lol. Outside of Strasser and Rohm the naxis were not terribly interested in massive wealth redistribution. That is not necessary for a socialist economy.
What fosters innovation?
What empirical evidence do you have which indicates socialism in and of itself promotes production? I got news for you, you have none. Why? Because socialist intellectuals do not even address it. They merely address the fairness or whatever about the redistribution. Others who HAVE addressed these aspects of socialism and indeed tested the tenets of socialism have shown again and again it fails and why it has failed.