FOS » 01 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑
I reject your definition lol. There can be socialism without wealth redistribution. And if you want to define socialism otherwise then I suppose the national socialists were not socialist.
The nazis were highly innovative. We never could have reached the moon without them...
You need intelligent and creative genius to have some motive to advance knowledge...largely inspired by being good for their people...their social identity group.
Well then what is your understanding of National Socialism? Capitalism combined with ethnic purity and the subjugation of the labor of inferior races internal and the further subjugation of the wealth of other non-Aryan nations? To include Austria, Czechoslavakia, Poland, USSR, North Africa, Middle East, South America and the United States.
I guess it was Churchill which brought about war by objecting to Hitler's policy of Lebensraum and the raping and pillaging of its neighbors.