11 Jun 2022 5:30 am
I would strongly suggest widening your reading list. Your sources of information are entirely slanted in their viewpoints. Anyone can do a google search on ANY subject and pull up a huge list of like minded individuals and organizations supporting any ideological leaning. It doesn't bolster your position one iota, and it does little to progress others towards an understanding of your logical reasoning should you have any.B.See » 11 Jun 2022, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑ right.
I've a sneaking suspicion we're going to SOON be hearing accounts APLENTY, bub.
Ivanka Trump told Jan. 6 committee that she accepted that her father lost election
Trump And His Allies Prepare Alternative Reality Of Lies To Counter Jan. 6 Hearings | HuffPost Latest News
Texas man tried to un-send messages bragging about storming the Capitol and told friends to delete the videos he sent them, DOJ says
How allegations of GOP 'reconnaissance' tours are rocketing back during the run-up to the Jan. 6 hearings - Raw Story
More evidence of criminal conspiracy to overturn election turns up in Eastman emails
Ohio Man Who Said ‘Antifa’ Was Responsible for Jan. 6 Pleads Guilty to Storming the Capitol John
Eastman discussed 'coup' plot with Trump a month before Jan. 6: analysis - Raw Story
US at risk of becoming authoritarian state after Jan. 6 insurrection, experts say - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism
There was no insurrection, planned or otherwise. This is a demonstrably false assertion and nothing more than left-wing attempts to change the language in an attempt to make it into something it wasn't. The special Select Committee hearing is nothing more than an attempted repeat of what has already been investigated to distract from issues the DNC does not want front and center (e.g. economy and inflation, Foreign policy and Afghanistan and Ukraine and China, border and immigration, Crime, etc.). It isn't even a real official hearing. None of the requirements for a Congressional hearing were met. It is a sham.