User avatar
freeman
22 Jan 2023 7:46 am
User avatar
   
1,132 posts
RedheadedStranger » 21 Jan 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I would probably have to see the wording of the tweet before I could say either way.

My first thought in a case like this is caveat emptor.

​​​​Nobody forced the shareholders to buy or hold the stock in the first place. That would be the starting point for me.
 
Mine too. Whiny babies seek to be made whole by others, after gambling their money and loosing it. Same thing could have happened as a result of a surprise bad earnings report.
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search