24 Feb 2022 8:06 am
I realize I missed (or at the time didn't know about) perhaps one the most important questions.
Would you have gotten the jab if you had known that it received emergency use authorization based on Pfizer's trial vaccine group of ~22,000 people having one COVID death, while their placebo control group of approximately the same size had just two COVID deaths?
Particularly considering that the SINGLE extra death could have been purely happenstance, like an immune response compromised by an acute vitamin D deficiency.
Yet this is where their 100% greater vaccine efficacy figure came from - 2 deaths are 100% greater than 1 death.
But worse than having to jab 22,000 people in order to save a single person from dying of COVID, any benefit was far more than cancelled out by a fivefold increase in excess fatal cardiac arrests and congestive heart failures in the vaccinated trial group (5/22,000).
How did Pfizer con millions of people into volunteering to be their phase 3 lab rats?
Would you have risked getting the jab if you had known that this is the "science" that was behind Pfizer's "efficacy" claims and emergency use authorization?
Particularly when you volunteered to be a phase 3 lab rat for a criminal corporation (that in the past has been guilty of committing crimes against humanity as well as "suppressing adverse trial results"), when globally the survival rate from COVID, for under 70-year-olds, has been 99.97%. That's a 3 in 10,000 risk of death from COVID - including obese diabetics with cancer.
Vaccine "hesitant" (pragmatic) VS vaccine blind obedient
Let alone as more of the risks from having volunteered to be a trial participant increasingly come to light.
Vaccine spike protein suppresses DNA repair engine of the human body
While "..... we are finding that those that have gotten the shots are getting Omicron, the vaccines are negatively affecting, meaning you are actually getting Omicron at an enhanced higher rate. Now there's a reason for this, and this is basic immunology....."
COVID-19: A Second Opinion - Senate testimony - a must-see video
".....what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
Cardiologist Who Wanted To Punch Antivaxxers In Face, Dies Suddenly After Boost
Is there anyone in this forum that believes they would have still gotten the jab, if they had been made aware of its authorization being based on that single death "science", at the time they got the jab?
Along with the rest of the list in the second post of this thread including what your actual risk was of dying from COVID:
viewtopic.php?p=1911221#p1911221
Would you have gotten the jab if you had known that it received emergency use authorization based on Pfizer's trial vaccine group of ~22,000 people having one COVID death, while their placebo control group of approximately the same size had just two COVID deaths?
Particularly considering that the SINGLE extra death could have been purely happenstance, like an immune response compromised by an acute vitamin D deficiency.
Yet this is where their 100% greater vaccine efficacy figure came from - 2 deaths are 100% greater than 1 death.
But worse than having to jab 22,000 people in order to save a single person from dying of COVID, any benefit was far more than cancelled out by a fivefold increase in excess fatal cardiac arrests and congestive heart failures in the vaccinated trial group (5/22,000).
How did Pfizer con millions of people into volunteering to be their phase 3 lab rats?
Would you have risked getting the jab if you had known that this is the "science" that was behind Pfizer's "efficacy" claims and emergency use authorization?
Particularly when you volunteered to be a phase 3 lab rat for a criminal corporation (that in the past has been guilty of committing crimes against humanity as well as "suppressing adverse trial results"), when globally the survival rate from COVID, for under 70-year-olds, has been 99.97%. That's a 3 in 10,000 risk of death from COVID - including obese diabetics with cancer.
Vaccine "hesitant" (pragmatic) VS vaccine blind obedient
Let alone as more of the risks from having volunteered to be a trial participant increasingly come to light.
Vaccine spike protein suppresses DNA repair engine of the human body
While "..... we are finding that those that have gotten the shots are getting Omicron, the vaccines are negatively affecting, meaning you are actually getting Omicron at an enhanced higher rate. Now there's a reason for this, and this is basic immunology....."
COVID-19: A Second Opinion - Senate testimony - a must-see video
".....what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
Cardiologist Who Wanted To Punch Antivaxxers In Face, Dies Suddenly After Boost
Is there anyone in this forum that believes they would have still gotten the jab, if they had been made aware of its authorization being based on that single death "science", at the time they got the jab?
Along with the rest of the list in the second post of this thread including what your actual risk was of dying from COVID:
viewtopic.php?p=1911221#p1911221