13 Apr 2022 7:37 am
And every time they tested mRNA vaccines on animals for corona viruses THEY FAILED, due to vaccine-enhanced disease, as even the insert and FDA warns about these jabs. Or did they forget to fully inform you about that, and the fact that you are the ferret this time around, since there was no animal testing prior to "vaccine" rollout.AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ The technology used in the Covid vaccinations has been around more than 20 years.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
"8.4.Unknown Risks/Data Gaps"
"Vaccine-enhanced disease Available data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure."
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?
And for what?
MyFreeDoctor.com has treated 150,000 COVID patients with a 99.99% success rate
While an inventor and patent holder of the mRNA technology platform warned not to use his technology for COVID-19 in January of 2020:
"4:04:50 - Vaccinologist Dr. Robert Malone: "The FDA absolutely, and my colleagues in vaccinology have long known that one of the great risks, one of the things that scares us most as vaccinologists, is vaccine-enhanced disease. And there's a long history of vaccine-enhanced disease examples over time. Respiratory Syncytial Virus is the one that's often cited by my fellow vaccinologists, but there's many others. This is why we have to be careful in developing these vaccines as one example of why we have to be so careful and why we have to be cautious about rolling them out and that we do the science. But in the case of vaccine-enhanced disease with corona virus vaccines this is a known complication. It's one of the reasons why I advised my group not to pursue vaccines when we got the call from Wuhan in January of 2020. Vaccine enhanced disease with corona viruses has long been a problem. It has compromised every prior corona vaccine development effort, including the veterinary ones. It's been overcome twice with veterinary vaccines and both of those are mucosal vaccines. So in short this is a known problem, many of us that are down in the trenches are carefully monitoring whether or not there are data emerging that suggest the problem might be occurring, and now we seem to be seeing clinical data that is consistent with that. But as Dr. Risch I'm sure will share we have to be cautious because there are multiple confounding variables."
4:07:00 - Yale School of Public Health professor of epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch: "Well no actually, the Public Health U.K. has actually published a statement about this in their week 42 weekly report that showed that people who've had COVID and then get vaccinated have lower levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, and this means - and since the vaccines don't address the nucleocapsid antigens, they only address the spike - it means that they're doing something that's damaging the immune response in a more general way than just what they do with the spike. And this is empirical data that Public Health U.K. has published. So we know that this is happening. It's not theoretical issue about all of the niceties about laboratory biology and virology about things that could happen, it's a real thing that's been really observed by VaR testing."
https://rumble.com/embed/vqjwua/?pub=4