Pastafarian » 03 May 2022, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑
Oh, early treatment, huh.
Still not good enough.
I’d rather not go through that, just in case.
But you do you.
Especially when ivermectin was hard to get.
I see. So rather than take a handful of pills for 7 days including one of the safest drugs on the planet at a cost of $20, beginning immediately upon the presentation of symptoms, with a
99+% chance of a comfortable recovery at home (those odds include elderly fat diabetics), you would "rather not go through that", when the alternative that
Fauci had prescribed was to isolate at home with no early treatment recommendation and do nothing until you begin to suffocate and then plug yourself into the hospital Illness Industry to get an IV of
kidney killing Remdesivir stuck in your arm and eventually a vent shoved down into your lungs, while you lay drowning in your own body fluids - at
an average cost of $73,300.
Good plan!
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals
To your last point, Ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine have been easy to get since early in the pandemic
through telemedicine, if your doctor
happened to be one of the incompetent malpracticing swine among those responsible for a million dead Americans.
Hydroxychloroquine has been particularly available, since it is
taken by millions of Americans every day of the year over decades for rheumatoid arthritis and Lupus, in the same dosage that the
Zelenko triple therapy prescribes over just 7 days.
Alternatively, by now there may be some new never before prescribed patented
experimental drugs with unknown long term side effects, that you can volunteer to be a lab rat for.
If you believe that "boosters" for protection against the original but now absent strain of COVID are the answer, according to a physician/
pathologist that presides over about 40,000 biopsies a year, ".....
we are finding that those that have gotten the shots are getting Omicron, the vaccines are negatively affecting, meaning you
are actually getting Omicron at an enhanced higher rate."
Which would seem to be increasingly evident according to Johns Hopkins data:
Are there signs of vaccine enhanced disease, judging by COVID death rates?
While according to the
inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology platform, ".....what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing
increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
As this jerk discovered the hard way:
Cardiologist Who Wanted To Punch Antivaxxers In Face, Dies Suddenly After Boost
And as far as your "vaccine" goes, the Israelis found that efficacy wanes at about 40% per month, which would mean
the curve of your "protection" would pretty closely resemble a drug half-life chart: