10 May 2022 11:11 am
That's what he said:B.See » 10 May 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Admittedly VERY interesting information. Though I still think I'll take my chances with that third booster shot.
Cardiologist Who Wanted To Punch Antivaxxers In Face, Dies Suddenly After Boost
Calculate your personal risk VS benefit ratio, before risking your life or permanent disability, and a lifetime of medical bills.
Vaccine RISK VS BENEFIT - Pragmatism (absurdly, "hesitant") VS blind obedience
It mostly all gets censored but a little gets through: "Vaccine" Injury
Observations of a 30 year vaccinologist, inventor and patent holder of the mRNA vaccine technology platform:
".....what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
Also a pathologist that presides over about 40,000 biopsies a year:
"..... however, we are finding that those that have gotten the shots are getting Omicron, the vaccines are negatively affecting, meaning you are actually getting Omicron at an enhanced higher rate. Now there's a reason for this, and this is basic immunology."
Rather than the propaganda, why not try contrary opinion with a little congressional testimony by medical professionals rather than reporters and TV doctors for a change? These are some of the most published professionals in the history of medicine.
Keep it in your taskbar and pick away at it when you get free moments (it's 2 hours)
I transcribed a little of it:
COVID-19: A Second Opinion
You probably already know that Fauci was trained in rheumatology and not epidemiology, virology, immunology or vaccinology.
I certainly welcome discussion for a change. Also that anti-ivermectin "study" fraud that Big Pharma's propagandists keep trotting out (just as Big Pharma did in 2020 with the fraudulent HCQ study that even used fictitious data):(And here YOU probably thought I was going to come in here and outright DISMISS FACTS and STATISTICAL EVIDENCE like SOME of these clowns do).
https://c19ivermectin.com/togetherivm.html
"Many major issues including multiple impossible numbers, blinding failure, randomization failure, and many protocol violations, as detailed below.
The TOGETHER Trial, another idiotic designed-to-fail waste of HCQ and Ivermectin
Also see: Fraudulent Trial On Ivermectin Published By The World's Top Medical Journal."
Comparing studies VS 99+% success rates in evidenced-based medical practice
Plus, one designed-to-fail study, that Big Pharma's lackeys like to trot out, does not a drug make.
https://c19ivermectin.com/
"160 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, 110 peer reviewed, 82 comparing treatment and control groups."
Ivermectin has been officially adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations).
This is no joke.
Compare COVID death rate in the ivermectin-poor US with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine-rich Nations
