20 May 2022 7:29 am
"Eric Clapton catches COVID-19 after calling vaccine efforts a ‘mass psychosis’"
Guffaw! And it truly is a mass psychosis since the headline obviously should have read:
"Eric Clapton catches COVID-19 even after being injured by a vaccine that was supposed to protect him from it!"
Or how about: "Everyone that catches COVID and does not seek early treatment with a 99+% effective generic multi-drug/nutraceutical protocol is stupid!"
So now let's see if you want to continue to marinate in stupidity, or if you can overcome your psychosis just long enough to answer a simple question.
1) Would you rather be a guinea pig and risk short and long term side effects from Big Pharma's 89% effective (claims the profiteer) experimental patented drug while sending a bill for $530 to burden your children's future (or what brain-dead idiots like pastafarian would call "free" like the "free" vaccines)? If you "qualify" for it!
2) Or would you rather take a 2+-year-proven multi-drug/nutraceutical protocol that includes ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine - that have both been proven to be among the safest drugs on the planet over the last 35 and 65 years - with the entire protocol costing under $20, that have both been proven to be virtually 100% effective if taken upon the onset of symptoms ever since March of 2020, both of which have virtually no side effects. While unlike Paxlovid, ivermectin has been shown to have efficacy not only in early but also in later treatment as well, since it is also anti-inflammatory.
151 ivermectin COVID studies, 103 peer reviewed, 81 comparing treatment &control
394 HCQ COVID-19 studies, 297 peer reviewed, 326 comparing treatment and control
Indeed hydroxychloroquine is taken by millions of Americans every day of the year over decades for Lupus and arthritis, in the same dosage that the Zelenko COVID protocol prescribes over just 7 days.
While billions of doses of ivermectin have been consumed by humans with such minimal side effects that the WHO recommends mass treatment with it as an effective public health strategy.
So can you be honest for a moment and tell us which you believe would be a better choice?
And I will press you until you answer.
Guffaw! And it truly is a mass psychosis since the headline obviously should have read:
"Eric Clapton catches COVID-19 even after being injured by a vaccine that was supposed to protect him from it!"
Or how about: "Everyone that catches COVID and does not seek early treatment with a 99+% effective generic multi-drug/nutraceutical protocol is stupid!"
So now let's see if you want to continue to marinate in stupidity, or if you can overcome your psychosis just long enough to answer a simple question.
1) Would you rather be a guinea pig and risk short and long term side effects from Big Pharma's 89% effective (claims the profiteer) experimental patented drug while sending a bill for $530 to burden your children's future (or what brain-dead idiots like pastafarian would call "free" like the "free" vaccines)? If you "qualify" for it!
2) Or would you rather take a 2+-year-proven multi-drug/nutraceutical protocol that includes ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine - that have both been proven to be among the safest drugs on the planet over the last 35 and 65 years - with the entire protocol costing under $20, that have both been proven to be virtually 100% effective if taken upon the onset of symptoms ever since March of 2020, both of which have virtually no side effects. While unlike Paxlovid, ivermectin has been shown to have efficacy not only in early but also in later treatment as well, since it is also anti-inflammatory.
151 ivermectin COVID studies, 103 peer reviewed, 81 comparing treatment &control
394 HCQ COVID-19 studies, 297 peer reviewed, 326 comparing treatment and control
Indeed hydroxychloroquine is taken by millions of Americans every day of the year over decades for Lupus and arthritis, in the same dosage that the Zelenko COVID protocol prescribes over just 7 days.
While billions of doses of ivermectin have been consumed by humans with such minimal side effects that the WHO recommends mass treatment with it as an effective public health strategy.
So can you be honest for a moment and tell us which you believe would be a better choice?
And I will press you until you answer.