23 May 2022 1:05 pm
With which I agreed in my first sentence: "I agree that case numbers are an encouraging sign."impartialobserver » 23 May 2022, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^^ is the definition of dense. One who obfuscates and can't practice simple reading comprehension because he is too zealous to see the forest for the trees. There is nothing special about you. Have seen dozens of zealots like you on forums.. each time, they can't get out of their own way.
The first post of mine was rather simple... our (state of NV govt employees) covid mandates were being washed away due to one simple fact.. declining case numbers.
But of course there are too many reasons not to take that at face value, which I felt obligated to and spent considerable time explaining. Even in graphic form from the Johns Hopkins site.
To which rather than thanking me for my trouble I was greeted by you with an insult.
So I thought if I pointed out your error in having done so, it may save you the embarrassment of repeating your having stepped into the role of that which you accuse, followed by having to run away from facts and data.
Perhaps you lost sight of the fact that many or perhaps most posters in here post for the benefit of all members and not just the person they are interacting with.
Ah yes Johns Hopkins data has always been the stuff of "conspiracy" right? Or at least to people that are allergic to inconvenient truth in the form of facts and data. You parroted the false accusation that Big Pharma's little bi*ch propagandists have been using to silence reason for well over 2 years now, when confronted with undeniable truth. While evolving from COVID Derangement Syndrome to HCQ Derangement Syndrome to Ivermectin Derangement Syndrome and eventually to COVID Vaccine Derangement Syndrome.No need to read anymore into it but this poster ^^^^ can't do that. Nahhh... it has to be some big conspiracy.
"The designers of this pandemic anticipated a pushback by the public and that major embarrassing questions would be asked. To prevent this, the controllers fed the media a number of tactics, one of the most commonly used was and is the “fact check” scam. With each confrontation with carefully documented evidence, the media “fact checkers” countered with the charge of “misinformation”, and an unfounded “conspiracy theory” charge that was, in their lexicon, “debunked”. Never were we told who the fact checkers were or the source of their “debunking” information—we were just to believe the “fact checkers”. A recent court case established under oath that facebook “fact checkers” used their own staff opinion and not real experts to check “facts”.[59] When sources are in fact revealed they are invariably the corrupt CDC, WHO or Anthony Fauci or just their opinion. Here is a list of things that were labeled as “myths” and “misinformation” that were later proven to be true........"
COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?