27 May 2022 7:57 am
Nobody has any trouble seeing why you didn't respond. Because you can't respond against truth with lies and falsehood.
It's a lie to say "you labeled all of my articles as nothing more than 'big pharma sales pitches'", though that case can easily be made.Here's a newsflash, you conspiracy laden, bamboozled GREMLIN,
The moment you labeled all of my articles as nothing more than "big pharma sales pitches" YOU LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.
So..... GFY.
The one I specifically referred to in this post.....
notifications.php#p2039289
.....in which you added a link to an article.....
These drugs could fight against BA.2 Omicron variant effectively
..... that states: ".....remdesivir, molnupiravir, and the active ingredient in Pfizer’s Paxlovid pill (nirmatrelvir), remain effective against the BA.2....."
So your inclusion of that link was not to pitch those dangerous and/or experimental drugs?
Then why link to emergency use authorized Pfizer’s Paxlovid (that I specifically called you out on) if not to encourage forum readers to become Big Pharma lab rats - yet again?
Whether wittingly or having been duped, you pitched for Paxlovid.
That's why you didn't respond. Because you could not deny you pitched a patented new emergency use authorized experimental drug (that costs $500 per course of treatment with some nasty side effects, when generic IVM or HCQ work better than Paxlovid in multi-drug/nutraceutical protocols and cost under $10, without side effects!).
Now regarding the false complaint of characterizing "all of my articles", the rest of the links in your post did indeed advance fear porn among those that remain mentally deranged through unfounded fear - to incite a few of the still-healthy unvaccinated people into receiving one of Big Pharma's toxic jabs.
So how were you NOT sales pitching for Big Pharma?!!!
There's this one that you included:
COVID uptick being felt across South Florida as CDC recommends taking added precautions – CBS Miami
Those "precautions"?
"Speaking of those who have still not gotten vaccinated or a booster shot, 'If they were wondering whether they should get their next booster and they have been putting it off now is the time,” says Dr. Marty.'"
Are you suggesting that's NOT a pitch for Big Pharma's toxic jabs that you posted..........bitch?!
Then there was this one:
Coronavirus cases in California rising fast, with some regions seeing infections double - Los Angeles Times
I'm not a subscriber so I can't read the article, but would I expect Big Pharma's media bitch the Los Angeles Times to bite the hand that feeds it and not pitch toxic jabs, any more than I would CBS of the prior article, or Fauci, the FDA, Big Tech, medical journals, or any of the rest of Big Pharma's paid bitches?
While my prior response to the article was it is irrelevant for anyone prepared for early treatment.
You posted this one:
Long Covid: Researchers find vaccines may help lessen symptoms in some individuals | Express.co.uk
"The researchers say vaccination after infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, is associated with a decrease in the likelihood of long covid symptoms."
Gee what a surprise! You're Big Pharma's bi*ch again!
Yet wouldn't ya know that a few bucks worth of Ivermectin works well for long-haul COVID:
Top Yale Doctor/Researcher: ‘Ivermectin works,’ including for long-haul COVID
continued....