4 Jan 2022 11:27 am
Isn't it funny how the same people who want to give Pfizer a pass for all of the non-vaccine deaths and permanent disabilities, while excusing away Pfizer's hiding of vaccine their trial data for the next 55 years, suggest that Pfizer wouldn't want to hurt their reputation by producing a harmful product. This even though Pfizer has been found guilty of crimes against humanity and many other crimes in the past, but still continue on, because the same caliber of morally bankrupt people ignore Pfizer's criminal history.Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ The fellow quoted is very clearly speaking about all deaths. He's an insurance CEO, speaking about his industry. His comments are not political. They are not in reference to Covid. They are in reference to specific quarters, and YOY numbers.
I have misrepresented nothing - I leave that to you, a dying fruitcake, and snopes, a dead fake-source.
Are those that get the "jab" even aware of Pfizer's history of criminal conduct?
The same corporate reprobates that were responsible for determining the "safety" of the non-vaccines are the same corporations that stand to profit from them while enjoying complete exemption from liability. No formula for disaster there, eigh?
These same idiots will run out and take Merck's new (cancer causing?) 30% effective COVID drug without hesitation, in spite of the half a million people Merck killed (though likely many more) with VIOXX.
Yet without hesitation these same blind fools defame the CEO of a $100 billion insurance company that has been around since 1877 for simply presenting an actuarial.