Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2022, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑
Pfizer is arguing that the act of paying off those responsible for oversight removes their liability - the successful commission of the crime justifies the crime itself: a snake eating its tail. We should get away with it, because we pulled it off.
Worse yet, that argument, in this corrupt environment, is likely to become stare decisis.
While Big Pharma's little lying bi*ches like Ikeygirl will continue attacking messengers rather than face the corruption of Pfizer Asking Court to Dismiss Whistleblower Lawsuit Because Government Was Aware of Fraud. Or wonder why the FDA requested to have until 2076 for full release of Pfizer data (that I believe all of which is supposed to be available for review prior to the issuance of any EUA).
As she completely ignores the 1291 adverse events of special interest that Pfizer's toxic jabs caused, in formerly healthy trial participants, over just the short course of their "trials".
Pfizer trials - 1,291 different "adverse events of special interest"