12 Sep 2022 11:35 am
People don't seem to understand that when the fire is in the middle of a building the structural failure begins there and as the interior collapses it pulls the floor members in, which pulls the walls in, which would take on the same appearance as a controlled demolition.Neo » 11 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ The building was hit by debris and a fire started. Columns were weakened leading to structural collapse. No weapon, no conspiracy, no controlled demolition. Building burned violently for hours before collapse. A raging fire would have neutralized or prematurely detonated any planned and planted explosives.
As far as the towers are concerned, I saw the engineer on the tube the next day, that said the fires only had to distort the floor beams in order for them to fail. Each beam was bolted to the outside wall with 4-5/8" bolts which were designed to work sheer. But as the beams deflected, the bolts were increasingly in tension from the plate on the end no longer being square to the wall. So regardless of which beam deflected first, there wasn't enough support left for the floor, while the floor below was certainly not engineered to carry the weight of the floor above, and obviously its being an exoskeletel structure helped to contain the floors as they pancaked down one on top of the other.
I've even seen some that suggest that there were explosives orchestrated to go off along with the planes flying into the buildings! Like there would have been a need for the planes!
They see the air compressing from the collapse and blowing out dust and smoke, and in a few places lower down indicating the of beginning failure from the shocks from the collapse of floors well above, making little dust clouds in lower corners, as being bombs going off!