12 Apr 2023 4:20 pm
[img][/img]Xavier_Onassis » 12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ They never me and had no "close ties".
Margaret Sanger was an advocate for birth control and a woman's right to contraceptives.
Hitler wanted German women to have as many children as possible.
Eugenics is not and never has been a part of any progressive agenda.
You are the one that sucks at research.
WTF are "National Conservatives"?
Taylor & Francis Online
https://www.tandfonline.com › pdf
Perfecting Humankind: A Comparison of Progressive and Nazi Views on Eugenics, Sterilization and Abortion
by J Hunt · 1999 · Cited by 5 — States, we see an interest in more than just birth control. While Sanger did not draw a distinction between "fit" and "unfit" along racial lines, as Nazi.