22 Jan 2023 2:10 pm
There are many unanswered questions about that day which still remain unanswered and anyone trying to look into it now is pretty much handcuffed by Google which has deplatformed over the years most of the relevant sites which did question the "official" versions of the events that day whom had a massive amount of information contrary to the "official" version.Vegas » 22 Jan 2023, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah yeah yeah....you all will call me a conspiracy theorist, blah blah blah...and yes, I know it happened over two decades ago...blah blah blah...
To this I reply, I don't care.
Below, I listed the things that still bother me. I have listened to the science on both sides, I have listened to the arguments on both sides. I am just not convinced that 19 rag heads could pull this off with box cutters.
1. When you compare the twin towers falling next to past controlled demolitions, they fell the same. Straight down, as if the physics was controlled by human ingenuity. And yes, I have listened to all the experts about how it could be possible...but it's also not probable. Especially three buildings.
2. Building 7 wasn't hit.
3. On 9/10, Rumfield announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing. On 9/11, a plane crashed into the accounting side of the pentagon.
4. It makes more sense that the plane going down in Pennsylvania was because the goat ropers probably didn't know how to fly the plane. Not because passengers rebelled. A rebellion makes for good emotionally charged narrative to get the public ready to support any counterattack from our government.
5. A new elevator maintenance company was hired months before 9/11. They easily had access to the building's blueprints and structural network.
I have an interesting story of a debate I was engaged in ....in 2004 that started one week before Ariana huffingiton's Arianna online's debate board "debate both sides" mysteriously got shut down forever without any explanation .
I and several other conservatives at Debate both Sides started a heated debate with a crew of debunkers from The James Randi Educational Foundation or JREF which were all over the net at that time trying to debunk anyone whom questioned the official versions of 9/11.
I spent almost 3 days researching everything I could find regarding the twin towers and in those days we pretty much had open access to everything available online ( real freedom) unlike it is today .
So, this idiot from JREF asks me to post the best scenario I could come up with that brought the towers down other than the planes and jet fuel.
well, I found out that not only was a new elevator company given access months before but also all the steel beams in both towers 5 months prior had been re-fire proofed with blow on insulation on the same floors that coincidentally showed squib's in the video's of their collapse.
I then researched explosives that could act like thermite but be easily molded into almost anything like say....blow-on insulation.
That explosive was HMX which upon combustion burns hotter than thermite.
so, I post this little scenario ....and with-in 8 hours of me posting it ......Debate both Sides gets deep sixed never to return and without any explanation by management as to why ....
coincidence?
At the time I thought so ....
But a few months later this same crew of JREF Debunkers shows up at another site I posted at ...at the time ATS or above top secret going through the same motions as they did at Debate both Sides .
Then they also showed up at 9/11 pilots for Truth ...shortly after that .....and many others .....