1 819 820 821 822 823 1,030
User avatar
Monderegal
24 Jan 2024 3:05 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,231 posts
Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2024, 3:39 pm » wrote: The thing about "joint military maneuvers" is that they focus on an objective. In the case of the joint military maneuvers between south korea and the u.s., the objective is an invasion of north korea. 

Of course, north korea has no way to be CERTAIN that it's only for training. So they have to respond with a defensive posture - and this defensive posture allows the joint powers to observe, record, and learn. 

For some reason that you may or may not be able to fathom, north korea doesn't appreciate these provocations. It takes them as a threat, for reasons I will not go into. 

Wait. Yes I will. 

If I approached you and punched directly at your face, repeatedly - but never touched you; stopped short each time, - would you respond negatively?

It's a yes/no - feel free to choose either option. Image
That's the nuclear umbrella I was talking about. Along with the fact that peaceful resolutions seem to be falling by the wayside for the North.
 
Therefore it's a yes that is closer to not ending in a handshake. That's the unity monument.
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
1 819 820 821 822 823 1,030
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search