*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑
We need to make an example out of her.
She was no doubt appointed by her [[[HANDLERS]]] to prosecute Trump but that doesn't matter.
Our Judiciary must be held to an even higher standard than the general public and it's obvious that this corrupt monkey fails miserably to pass the test.
So, are we now going to go around auditing everyone's financial statements and loan applications, prosecute and imprison those who are not in default but over/under stated information etc?
Or, do you just want to prosecute
her for this. Selective enforcement. Same selective **** enforcement they did against Trump.
While I completely agree that what happened to Trump and his financial statements was total F-ing ****. I'd rather pursue those who weaponized the judiciary against Trump for the genuine crimes of treason, weaponizing the justice system, conspiracy, racketeering, etc. That's different than going after someone for the same kind of **** they went after Trump for.