15 Aug 2024 11:06 am
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ What, exactly, is your theory here?
That a publication with a readership of 1.25 million, and a very deep pocketed owner, would appropriate the names of the archive and photographer, identify one of the subjects as the readily litigious Wee Donnie....and all affected parties just let it slide?
Is that it?
Then why oh why is there NOTHING to be found ANYWHERE that backs you up. This would be a huge scandal, but you and ONLY you seem to have an opinion on the picture. Hmmmmmmm...........