23 Sep 2023 2:58 pm
.......okay, it may have not been a resounding "hell no" but it was no.DeezerShoove » 23 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I'd view it as "close to no" as a politician running for election comes these days.
No deal-breaker in this answer.
Hedging against making babies inside a human. A male human with an artificially installed baby bag.
Frankenbabies are next. That blows the "men can't get pregnant" apart a bit.
They still will be MADE pregnant, not GET pregnant. Phony views will be the argument at that point.
btw
Erick Erickson's RedState site banned me. For basically nothing.
**** those thin-skinned dopes, too.
...male and female that's it....
.....will tune into WSB radio from time to time in the afternoon and there are things Erick says that I agree with and things that he says that I disagree with.
....I've seen you post here, not sure why you would experience a banning.....