B.See » 11 Jun 2022, 3:30 am » wrote: ↑
His problem was thinking that magats, bigots, racists, women-haters, fascists, nazis, supremacists and those of LIKE ilk, could be reasoned with in the FIRST place. I've decided to do my best to IGNORE them.
Hey, if you're here posting FOR them instead of IN SPITE OF THEM, then you're in the WRONG PLACE.
Typical of a leftist to say if you disagree with my political ideology then you must be in league with magats, bigots, racists, women-haters, fascists, nazis, supremacists, etc... and I won't engage because I believe in group identity politics, even though it's nothing more than stereo typical idiocy to put people in categories based on rigid generalizations that are mostly based off prejudice, that apparently they claim they are against.