20 Oct 2022 12:43 pm
Have you read it, thought about it, asked yourself how it shows the trial was corrupt? If so, it's still your turn to tell us the fruit of these thoughts, what fruit there may be. If not, don't ask me to do your work for you.FOS » 20 Oct 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ Let me help you out with your legal education, buddy. Here is something very pertinent to the case in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_comment
read it. Think about it. Realize you don't understand the letter of the law as well as you assumed.
Then ask yourself why this trial was corrupt
Your link aside, Jones lost the case and no non-political claim that the trial was corrupt is being made by anyone with a legal background.
But let's hear yours anyway.