23 Jan 2023 9:04 am
I thought you were smarter than that. "Even if you grant" the edit? You cut off everything after "value". As explained the first time, it is the freedom to speak that has value, even if the speech itself has none. "Lies and plain stupidity" obviously do have none. Speech calling for the violation of any part of the Constitution may cause animus to the speaker; don't see why it would to the Constitution. The liberal animus involving the Second Amendment is focused on the amendment's interpretationCannonpointer » 22 Jan 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Lying piece of ****. Here was you REAL post, that you cry I did not preserve word for word. Let's look at it - WORD FOR WORD.
"Free speech has little value, even negative value, when it's debased, and it's debased on Twitter by illiteracy, lies and plain stupidity."
Your post advocates against free speech when it is against YOUR OPINION.
Even if I grant your reframe, weak jaggov, who gets to SAY that it "provokes animus to the Constitution," dick sucker? Does speech calling to violate the second amendment "provoke animus to the Constitution," you piece of ****? I would say it certainly does, weakness. But I would NEVER call to censor that speech, because unlike you, I'm a liberal.
by the courts, not the language of the amendment.
You're a liberal like you're a literate commentator. Not so much.