27 Nov 2022 12:45 am
"The regular joes who would eat it are the guys who have the pleasure of owing a city home with a double lot. It would suck for them. Take the example above. Their land tax would got to 1800 plus 210 for the house. They would have to make a decision: eat the higher taxes, or do something with the lot. Sell it, build on it, or stop paying the tax and let the city eventually seize it."Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2022, 2:04 am » wrote: ↑ Both of these propositions are false. If valuations are "arbitrary" under LVT - and they most certainly are not, - then they are already arbitrary under real estate taxes. Therefore, no harm is done in this regard by switching to LVT.
Regarding your claim that I "think" an acre is "too much property," are you referring to ranches? Football stadiums? Too much property for WHAT, you ridiculous buffoon? And for WHOM, you ridiculous buffoon?
I can assure you that I anticipate the compounds of families like the Kennedys will be larger than the yards of average retirees living on a pension. The very idea that I have commented on how large some unknown stranger's parcel ought to be is ***-pulled and laughable, you simple ****.
