Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2022, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑
Perhaps you and I read charts differently. The link you posted shows the lowest earners taxed at 1%, the next lowest at 2, next at 3 and so on up to above 12% for the highest earners.
That seems to be what you are saying would be ideal - a progressive tax which goes up proportionally as income rises. In fact, unless I misunderstand, you APPEAR to be grousing about the order in which the chart presents the numbers - beginning with the lowest earner.
Do you understand that if the order of the chart's presentation were reversed, this would have no effect, for good or ill, on the lower earning demos?
Were you genuinely incapable of reading that chart? I'm almost inclined to forgive everything, if this is really your competence level.
May I inquire, are you a minority, by any chance?
So, you really think a family earning $1,250,739 is "the highest earners?"
As CEO at AT&T INC., J. Stankey made $23,352,010 in total compensation in 2021.
Brian L. Roberts
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Comcast:
Total Compensation in 2021 was $33,976,749
Michael J. Cavanagh
Chief Financial Officer of Comcast:
Total Compensation in 2021 was $27,356,996
David N. Watson
CEO of Comcast Cable:
Total Compensation in 2021 was $22,166,414
Jeffrey Shell
CEO of NBCUniversal:
Total Compensation in 2021 was $21,509,028