25 Oct 2022 9:33 pm
Maybe you forgot a simple principle from back in grade school, assuming you made it that far, but it's the side that makes the existentially positive claim ("Republicans care about illegal immigration and want to drastically reduce it/fix the problem") that is responsible for satisfying "burden of proof," not the side questioning the validity of said claim.
When I say something along the lines of "Republicans don't give a **** about illegal immigration," I am questioning the existentially positive claim. If someone claimed "God exists" - the burden of proof is on THAT person and not the opponent questioning God's existence.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm surprised you haven't asked me to prove the Republicans are subservient to the Jews.
Let me guess...in your pea brain, it just so happens that Jews, who control the monetary system, the media, the narrative, push for post-modernist insanity like transgenders in sports, etc. managed to corrupt and take over the Democratic Party and push for all the policies you hate, but the Republican Party has remained immune?
LOL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) "There's no evidence Republicans care about the illegal alien invasion as you put it."
2) "Most of them are happy to flood this country with more if given the opportunity."
#1 is not my burden of proof. It is a simple statement that there is insufficient (close to zero) evidence they do care, and if they do it's for theatrics (maybe you've heard of PR before? Or the fact they want PEONS like you to cup your balls, vote for them every 2 or 4 years, and hope for change?) rather than any substantive policy.
#2 off the top of my head:
1) Amnesty under Reagan - big red flag
2) Republicans controlled both houses of Congress under Clinton; they supported small amnesty bills while also increasing "border security funding" (which if you have an IQ higher than a snail, you should know the phrase means nothing) - another red flag
3) Bush basically followed the same path as Clinton with "MOAR SECURITY FUNDING"
George W. Bush and Mexican Immigration Policy | Cairn.info
All theater.Congress authorized $1,2 billion to begin constructing a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. Though the border separating the two countries is more than 2,000 miles long, the construction of a fence along a small portion of it was largely a symbolic political gesture to placate conservative critics. Erecting a fence along one portion of the border simply shifted the movement of illegal immigrants to other sections of the border and did absolutely nothing to curtail the roughly forty percent of illegal immigrants who entered the country legally and overstayed their visas.
4) For all of Trump's rhetoric, we know for a fact he didn't build a wall (other than maybe ~100 or so miles which is useless, the rest was just refurbishing the fence that already existed), deportations were in line with the figures near the end of Obama's 2nd term, and the most damning evidence is he surrounded himself with Jews who obviously had no intention of backing a hardline "anti-illegal immigration" stance.
With people like (((Jared the Jew))) as allies, who needs enemies? XD
Is it possible you're lashing out at me because I exposed you as a useful tool for (((the globalists))) and their pawns like tRump? If so, you should be mad at THEM, not me, since I'm the only one kind enough to tell you that you've been played like a Klaus Heffler violin.