1 281 282 283 284 285 973
User avatar
ZiggyX
19 Dec 2022 11:20 am
User avatar
   
980 posts
Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2022, 12:13 pm » wrote: it also used to say for same race only.  …NOT mixed 

so the definition has changes before, you just do like THIS change
There were 'marriages' in China, India, America, and everywhere else.  
The core tenet was 'men and women'.  NOT people of the same sex.
I'm sure you could dig around and find Laws preventing different people from marrying.
I think in India you had to belong to the same caste category.

You may be deliberately missing the point here.
 
1 281 282 283 284 285 973
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search