Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑
I'd think very hard about the possible consequences of finding oneself in agreement with a slack jawed foxfed rube who couldn't make any case beyond "Is too!" in support of a single cited instance.
But that's just me.
That would straddle me in a quandary of contemplating the possible consequences of agreeing with those unsophisticated enough to fall for the chicanery outlined below...which happens to pollute the "other side"...
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/mK7GzMH94L8
Either way I have my work cut out...