29 Dec 2022 12:31 am
I can assure you I have no "contempt prior to investigation" for any of them...I simply analyzed the quality of their arguments/if they made any content worth watching/if they have ulterior motives. I believe I am more than qualified to judge these personalities.DeezerShoove » 28 Dec 2022, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ First, we are in agreement on that being a good thing.
Basically, to blanket damn something would require more than "a bit".
I can see expressing a real dislike for what I found but,
I couldn't personally get so emotionally involved to damn them that intensely.
Starting a thread containing "analysis" and all...
Like months of research and polls and a team of experts came on board.
All because "a bit of research" . . . omitting, of course, "contempt prior to investigation".
As for being emotionally involved, I could care less about their political leanings/their personal characteristics. For example, I believe I was MORE than fair by claiming JR covers just about everything but is quite shallow in that his cross-examinations are not particularly strong, which allows certain individuals like Tulsi Gabbard (member of the WEF's "Young Leaders") to get away with propaganda. Or that Bernie Sanders is attempting to "start a revolution" but then urges his voters to throw their weight behind the candidate with a (D) next to their name when Sanders inevitably loses the nomination.