User avatar
*rippy38
26 Jul 2024 7:33 am
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2024, 5:59 am » wrote: No, Country.

You haven't explained the function of the dash in your scenario.

Because you aren't just a coward, you're also an imbecile.
It's not my problem that you can't or won't accept the explanation provided... my point still stands that your interpretation on the author's grammatical intent with use of a dash, while valid, isn't the only option in this scenario.

Now come the crayons...

The fact that the "soft landing" mention in your excerpt is still speculative at this point shows that the entire thought is still an opinion, and not a fact... so the "according to some economists" applies to the entire thought... not just the cherry picked portion you want it to apply to.

Class dismissed.

:faint:  
 



1 Nomination

ROG62 Jul 25, 2024

Go to original post on Jul 26, 2024 6:31am
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search