1 209 210 211 212 213 12,266
User avatar
*rippy38
21 Jan 2023 2:24 pm
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
DeezerShoove » 21 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: You are right . . . to a point.

Did this person (who is the most influential person regarding that stock) make a statement
that could be construed as a valid direction for that company?
Stock trading is predicting the future based on information at hand after all.
Is Mr. Tesla's mere utterance about the company considered information?
That's why I said I would need to see what he tweeted first.

It would also have to be determined if the tweet was considered an official statement or Musk just pontificating on social media I would think. 

It also brings up the question... if Musk had just made a move with his company without saying a word about it, and investors lost money, could they still sue him for losing their investment?

It's a difficult one to call for sure. My BIL is a financial/real estate attorney, so I would probably check with him before nailing down a final opinion. 

Image  

​​​
 
 
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 209 210 211 212 213 12,266
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search