24 Oct 2023 10:05 am
like I said, you can crunch the numbers anyway you want~ I lived during those years and those are my first hand accounts.Cannonpointer » 23 Oct 2023, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑ You can repeat your programming all you want. Carter's economy created more jobs per year than did reagan's - and most of his were full time, not part time.
Run your programming, stooge.
Likely story. Even if true (highly doubtful) correlation is not causation, narrative breath.
He inherited the sins of johnson and nixon, son. Going off silver and going off breton woods had to be absorbed into the system. Carter's policies worked and reagan got the credit.
Carter's economy created in 4 years 64% of the jobs that reagan's created in 8. And reagan manipulated the tax code to INDUCE employers to offer part time employment, giving them tax breaks for each employee, regardless of house worked. His "jobs" were in many cases ****. Carter's were real work.
Mind you, Reagan's economy was eating tomorrow's lunch, whereas Carter's was paying yesterday's tab.
Here's the actual math - not your anecdotal programming:
https://blogs-images.forbes.com/mikepat ... Jobs-1.png
