maineman » 12 Aug 2023, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑
How can Michigan be "starting the process" to imprison people for saying pronouns when the word "PRONOUN" does not appear in the legislation that they are considering?
I'm not going to go in circles with you. see the word "expression" below? right after gender identity?
part of the bill!
=19.2pxfollowing:=19.2px17
=19.2px(a) Race or=19.2px =19.2pxcolor=19.2px.=19.2px18
=19.2px(=19.2pxb)=19.2px =19.2pxReligion=19.2px.=19.2px19
=19.2px(=19.2pxc)=19.2px =19.2pxSex=19.2px.=19.2px20
=19.2px(d) Sexual=19.2px =19.2pxorientation=19.2px.=19.2px21
=19.2px(e) Gender=19.2px =19.2pxidentity or=19.2px =19.2pxexpression=19.2px.=19.2px22
=19.2px(f) Physical=19.2px =19.2pxor mental disability=19.2px.=19.2px23
=19.2px(g) Age.=19.2px24
=19.2px(h)=19.2px =19.2pxEthnicity=19.2px.=19.2px25
=19.2px(i) National=19.2px =19.2pxorigin=19.2px.=19.2px26
=19.2px(j) Association or=19.2px =19.2pxaffiliat