maineman » 12 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑
so... you admit that PRONOUN is not a part of the bill
and the bill is about someone who intimidates or harasses another individual; causes bodily injury or severe mental anguish to another individual; uses force or violence on another individual; damages, destroys, or defaces any real, personal, digital, or online property of another individual; or threatens, by word or act, to do any of the above-described actions, if the person, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factors.
The proposed law does not criminalize anyone for using a pronoun, it criminalizes someone as committing a hate crime for attacking someone because THEY THEMSELVES used a pronoun to describe themselves.
The proposed law doesn't criminalize speech, it criminalizes causing bodily injury simply because someone else speaks about themselves using pronouns that offend the criminal.
calling him a him when he identifies as her will be causing him great mental anguish! people are already being fired for that, (and no, I'm not providing links you can read about them if you wish) and this bill is a step towards making it illegal to him a him if he identifies as a her.
enought, get lost. your arguments are repeating themselves and have been shot down.