yeah, just ask those on DJT's sexual abuse case; no witness, no doctors report, no screams, no police report. Then the transparent extension of the law just so it could be tried. Sounds fair and impartial to me!Neo » 25 Aug 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ It's different when you are on a jury, or at least that is my experience. The "crimes" Trump is accused of are unproven legal theories. A jury of democrats might not be convinced of their validity.