But with his accountability for an act (that is in itself, highly debatable), remaining in question, you have no right to do anything based on the basis the act happened and he was involved. I feel it was an insurrection, and I feel Trump was involved so that's enough to disqualify him. Outside a gender studies classroom, nothing works like that
Until you can reliably ascertain that the act in question actually was the act you think it was - and that the man you think was actively involved, actually was involved, - you have no act and no one involved. No such determination has taken place.
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.