18 Jul 2023 2:01 pm
They may well do, but in both cases those felonies are repeating the same felony over and over in order to get to the silly number. The point being, if one instance falls - they pretty much all do. Whether Trump survives the pile on or not is almost a trivial issue. The point for me is, can society survive it? This is not just a pile on, on Trump - it's also a pile-on on 50% of the electorate... while no one will touch the Bidens.. clearly.. Scary timesmaineman » 18 Jul 2023, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I am curious as to what the MAGA crowd thinks about the growing list of indictments against their standard bearer.
Alvin Bragg in New York has a 34-count felony indictment. Jack Smith already has a 38-count indictment for Mar-a-Lago document mishandling. He is preparing to come down with a second batch of indictments focusing on the January 6th attempted insurrection. He is also contemplating yet another round of indictments in New Jersey for Bedminster document mishandling. Fani Willis in Georgia is poised to jump in as well. The clown literally could be facing hundreds of felonies within the next few months.
Do you folks think that he can survive this pile-on? I realize that, for the MAGA faithful, the clown could, indeed, shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and you'd never even pause to spit his scrotum out of your collective mouths, but do you really think that the middle of the bell curve - the moderate conservatives not soaked with koolaid, and the independents - will be able to look past his immoral, craven criminality and vote for your guy in 2024? Your loyalty may secure him the nomination, but it may very well doom him... and his leaden coattails may drag the rest of the GOP ticket down as well.
Discuss!
I think also, just about everyone is sick of listening to Biden supporters call Trump immoral craven and criminal, as if that's a genuine reason for Democrats to not vote for him - when clearly they don't give a **** about any of those issues.
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.