I won't argue against any of this.Cannonpointer » 08 Mar 2023, 11:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Ever heard the phrase, "condemned with weak praise?"
Here's a corollary: "Defended with weak condemnation/insipid agreement."
When I posted a PHOTOGRAPH of a tranny story hour grooming event, you defended the ugliness by dismissing it as a mere "meme":
And we know just where you stand on the trans issue from this:
Either objective reality as measured by chromosomes and morphology determine sex - in which case we CAN protect women and girls by providing them with sex-segregated spaces and sports; or it is determined by unfalsifiable, unscientific CLAIMS - in which case we cannot. Men protect women and children from confused and deranged predators - cucks bail, cuck.
Which side you come down on - cagey though you've been to avoid being trapped into a position - is manifest, groomer.