11 Jun 2023 9:13 pm
Now, let's review the facts, sans hyperbole and rant langauge.Beekeeper » 06 Jun 2023, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry for your luck, pigsnot, but you claimed that :"possession" alone of ANY CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS was a violation of the Espionage Act. Biden HAD possession of CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS. PERIOD. So he was IN VIOLATION based on YOUR VERY OWN CLAIM!!
During his campaign before the 2016 election, Trump said:
“In my administration, I’m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information. No one will be above the law.”
"We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the word confidential or classified."
Trump admitted that he had documents he didn't classify, and admitted they were secret to persons
without security clearances.
He expressed to his lawyer 'wouldn't it be better if we told them there were no documents?'.
Trump obstructed the govts efforts to retrieve national defense top secret documents.
He hid them from the FBI and his own lawyers.
They were placed in restrooms, shower stalls, open ballrooms and storage rooms.
Over 150 weddings and events have been held ad Mar A Lago since Trump left office.
He revealed them to persons without security clearances.
The indictment, in excruciating detail, reveals the criminal disregard for security the nation's secrets.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
Such are the aggravated circumstances relating to national defense documents which is the DOJ's policy
is to prosecute.
Neither Pence nor Biden did this. As long as Senators and Exec branch personnel with documents cooperate fully with the govt for their return, DOJ's policy is that they will be given the benefit of the doubt that they were acquired inadvertently. It would require aggravated circumstances to warrant prosecution, as is the case with Trump.
Any other person who committed the aggravated acts Trump committed would have been arrested, book, tried, convicted and incarcerated.
Reality winner got 5 years for just revealing to the public just one document.
We cannot have a commander in chief violating the Espionage Act with the kind of aggravated circumstances that have been committed by Trump.
No magistrate will automatically sign off on a warrant to search the home of the former President of the United States.And ANY PARTISAN magistrate will sign off on ANY search warrant, which is what occurred here.
Your claim defies logic. when Judges exhibit partisanship, they get smacked down on appeal.
Suck on this:Run along now. You're getting tediously STUPID all over yourself.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf