12 Jun 2023 6:12 pm
Your comment seems to discuss a broader legal context rather than the specific charges against Donald Trump. So, I'm a little curious as to your point?Beekeeper » 12 Jun 2023, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑ A Critical Look at Navy v. Egan
A 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision known as Department of the Navy v. Egan has often been interpreted to support broad presidential authority over national security generally and over access to classified information in particular. Along with United States v. Reynolds, Curtiss-Wright, and a few other cases, Egan is regularly cited in support of strong, even unchecked executive authority and judicial deference to executive claims. It has become a cornerstone of national security law as practiced today.