13 Jun 2023 10:44 pm
The clinton tapes were not subject to the PRA.Beekeeper » 13 Jun 2023, 5:42 am » wrote: ↑ Oh dippyshiitty, that CLINTON TAPES CASE has FULL bearing on this case!!
You see, the ONLY ONE who can designate PERSON PAPERS from "Government papers" is THE EX PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT who possesses them!! Not the NARA, NOT the FBI, NOT the CIA, NOT THE DOJ, NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEM!! And the PRA STATES THAT POINT VERY SUCCINCTLY!!
And that "special master" was to ALLOW TRUMP to designate PER THE PRA, what was his and what he would return, not as you claim. Which is WHY the DOJ appealed the decision!! Trump didn't take it higher ONLY because that work was already finished!!
It sucks that you are UNABLE TO READ AND COMPREHEND simple court rulings and LAWS, huh, ****??
Sorry, doesn't apply.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2023 ... not-compa/
AI: the “sock drawer tapes” case refers to a 1996 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that allowed President Bill Clinton to keep audiotapes in his sock drawer. The tapes were recordings of conversations between Clinton and his advisers and were not subject to the Presidential Records Act (PRA) because they were not created or received in the course of official business1.However, it is not a good argument to compare this case with Trump’s indictment. Trump is accused of mishandling classified documents after his exit from the Presidency2. The indictment alleges that Trump “gathered newspapers, press clippings, letters, notes, cards, photographs, official documents, and other materials in cardboard boxes that he kept in the White House. Among the materials Trump stored in his boxes were hundreds of classified documents” 3.