5 Jun 2023 1:41 pm
Hogswallop.ConservativeWave » 03 Jun 2023, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑ [ truncated, see original comment..]
1) Hillary Clinton CREATED the "Russian Collusion" fiasco LIE... and THEN, the FBI used it to justify a TWO YEAR Special Council investigation of Donald Trump... that ended up convicting him of NOTHING !
2) THE FBI had MORE evidence that Hillary Clinton colluded with Russians, AND that Joe Biden was corrupt and accepted BRIBES, and YET, NEVER investigated ANY OF IT, OR EITHER of THEM !
3) The FBI falsified evidence to get FISA Warrants authorized, and THEN, used them to illegally SPY on Donald Trump !
4) The FBI had the Hunter laptop, but THEY called it "Russian Disinformation"... THEY ALSO organized 51 career "High Profile" Deep State elites to sign a letter SWEARING it WAS Russian Disinformation (before the 2020 election)... BUT, we NOW KNOW... that the "LETTER" was the LIE (and 51 Deep State elites LIED by signing it), and that the Hunter laptop IS, and WAS, REAL... and the FBI KNEW it !!
[ truncated due to 4000 character limit ]
Hillary Clinton and the "Russian Collusion" fiasco: The assertion that Hillary Clinton created the "Russian Collusion" narrative is not supported by factual evidence. The origins of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election can be traced back to concerns raised by intelligence agencies.
Alleged FBI bias and lack of investigation into Clinton and Biden: The claim that the FBI had more evidence regarding Clinton's collusion with Russians or Biden's corruption, yet failed to investigate, lacks substantiated evidence.
Falsification of evidence and illegal surveillance: You provided no credible evidence and verified information to support such claims.
Hunter Biden's laptop and the FBI's involvement: The claim that the FBI labeled Hunter Biden's laptop as "Russian Disinformation" and organized a group of individuals to sign a letter confirming this is an oversimplification. The situation surrounding the laptop and its contents is complex, and different viewpoints exist. But, it's a red herring, or not one of much legal import. There is no evidence of Joe Biden illegality. So, if it's true they suppressed it, that was the right thing to do, as, given there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by Biden, it would be wrong to introduce it during the election (because there isn't real evidence against Biden), Republicans would just use it as innuendo to smear Biden, which is precisely what they are doing now, making vacuous claims without evidence. Hell, David Weiss, the US ATTY Delaware assigned as Special Counsel by Bill Barr, has been left by Joe Biden to finish the job. That isn't the act of a corrupt president, that is the act of a righteous president, noting that after 4 years, no indictments have been handed down on Hunter, or anyone. The whole affair is a side show to deflect attention away from the real 900 pound gorilla in the room, Donald Trump and his crimes.
Impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump: Impeachment processes are part of the constitutional checks and balances in the United States.
Raid on Trump's Mar-a-Lago home: Much hype about it, but It wasn't a raid,the search warrant was executed by the FBI who went out of their way to be nice to Trump, hell, they didn't even adorn themselves with FBI jackets, they word golf attire to 'blend in' , and the issue was due to Trump's obstructing the government's efforts to retrieve TS docs.
Charges against Trump for hush money: Yes, he did this, and he is being charged in a related matter, 34 felony counts.