11 Sep 2023 7:00 am
Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.OdeToJoy » 11 Sep 2023, 3:32 am » wrote: ↑ When you show me a single court case Trump has won showing extensive voter fraud.
It is not Trump's job.... election fraud of a federal presidential election is investigated by the DOJ and their findings of evidence is brought before the courts... looks like you missed a simple step in the process... your non logic is no more logical than you claiming to see a murder and throwing a dead body up on the judges bench as your evidence, without law enforcement collecting the evidence ....
Please tell us where Trump would obtain any evidence of voter fraud? TELL US EXACTLY where this evidence is physically located and who has possession of this evidence? Yep... the accused has possession of this evidence.... video footage, actual ballots being disputed and all are locked up by the accused...never any honest thorough DOJ investigation to bring to court.. Please tell us physically were this evidence of voter fraud is located..If a sworn affidavit claim that a poll watchers saw unsigned ballots... is that poll watchers suppose to walk over and take the ballot for evidence? Is that how that works? One claim ballots being signed in the parking lot... how is that person suppose to obtain the video surveillance of the parking lot?