Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2021, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑
Buffalo » 26 Aug 2021, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑
"The FDA has not reviewed data to support use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients to treat or to prevent COVID-19; however, some initial research is underway. "
When was this article written? No date on it. Fact--the FDA has had nearly 2 YEARS to review data supporting Ivermectin's efficacy against the ccp wuhan intentional virus. Fact is the FDA is owned by big pharma and will NEVER "review" the supporting data because the patent on Ivermectin expired long ago and therefore big pharma cannot make BILLIONS from renaming it and jacking up the price 10,000 fold. Instead the FDA authorizes an experimental, unproven so-called "vaccine" cocktail of who knows what that is making big pharmas billions from the government paying for it while pushing the taxpayers deeper in debt. All intentional and totally avoidable.
Money and politics is preventing the use of Ivermectin to end the intentional plandemic. Its efficacy against the ccp wuhan intentional virus has been demondtarted and proven MILLIONS of times all over the world just not by the bought and paid for FDA.
It's not an anti-viral..
No demonstrated value..
Ivermectin is an anti-viral
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 0response.
...